NDIS Quality and Safeguards Commission
A request was made for an internal review of FOI (14) 26/27 - 1. The original FOI scope was: Any agreement, memorandum of understanding or other arrangement between the Commission and the Australian…
Show full title
A request was made for an internal review of FOI (14) 26/27 - 1. The original FOI scope was: Any agreement, memorandum of understanding or other arrangement between the Commission and the Australian Federal Police concerning Project Preveze. Records sufficient to identify any information the Commission has provided to Project Preveze, or received from Project Preveze, including any covering instrument under which that information was provided or received. Any privacy impact assessment or privacy threshold assessment prepared in relation to the Commission's participation in, or receipt of information from, Project Preveze. I am not seeking operational or investigative material -- no risk indicators, matching methodologies, data specifications, or information about particular providers, participants or investigations. My interest is confined to governance and privacy compliance documentation
Summary
AI-generatedWritten by Claude Haiku 5.5 from the extracted text on 30 Oct 2026. It can miss or misread redacted and scanned pages. Check the source before relying on it.
This release concerns an internal review of FOI request FOI (14) 26/27 - 1, which sought governance and privacy compliance records about the NDIS Quality and Safeguards Commission's dealings with Project Preveze, an arrangement involving the Australian Federal Police. The applicant specifically excluded operational or investigative material, risk indicators, matching methodologies, data specifications and information about particular providers, participants or investigations. The scope covered any agreement or memorandum of understanding with the AFP, records identifying information exchanged with Project Preveze and any covering instrument, and any privacy impact or threshold assessment. The text provided does not describe the content of the two documents released in part, their dates, or the specific exemptions applied to any redactions, so the number of records located, the nature of any agreement and any privacy findings cannot be confirmed from this extract.
Document text
965 characters extracted
The document text opens on its own page.